EQUITY CASE 7071
Empower Me to Know My
History
CHAWANOCHUBBY, Samuel
- Chickasaw Freedman Card
#93
- Enrollment #374
- Place of Residence: Johnsonville,
Pontotoc County-Indian Territory, Chickasaw Nation
- Father: CHAWANOCHUBBY,
Isom aka NEWBERRY, Isom-Chickasaw Indian (Deceased)
- Mother: Lina (Deceased)
CLARK, Mason
- Chickasaw Freedman Card #54
- Enrollment #231-234 & 4227
- Place of Residence: Ada, Pontotoc County-Indian Territory, Chickasaw Nation
- Father: CHAWANOCHUBBY, Isom aka NEWBERRY, Isom-Chickasaw Indian (Deceased)
- Mother: Lina (Deceased)
The case of Samuel CHAWANOCHUBBY to be transferred from the
Chickasaw Freedmen Roll to the Chickasaw by Blood Roll is an interesting
example of someone claiming citizenship. In many of the files of the Dawes
Commission we don’t get an opportunity to see how the names of their parents
become a part of the historical record. In the case of Samuel and his sister Mason CLARK
the M1301 Interview Packet provides us with information I wish were a part of
every record.
The documents contained in the file not only provide the
name of Samuel’s father but it provides more information about his father that
is not apparent when you look at what the clerk for the Dawes Commission
recorded on the rear of his card. Sam provided the first name of his father as Isom and informed the
commissioner that his father had an “English name” of NEWBERRY.
Sam informed the commissioner that his father and
mother Lina “were married according the Indian custom; that is they lived
together as man and wife…up to the time of the death of his father just after
the war.” Sam went on to inform the commissioner his parents had five children in total but only two were living at the time of the Dawes allotment process.
M1301 CHAWANOCHUBBY, Samuel CHIF#93 p3 |
M1186 CHAWANOCHUBBY, Samuel CHIF#93F |
M1186 CHAWANOCHUBBY, Samuel CHIF#93R |
Included in the interview is another document that really demonstrates just how
intertwined the former slaves of the Chickasaw Indians were with the culture of the
tribe. Samuel’s sister Mason CLARK needed a certified interpreter to provide
her testimony to the Dawes Commission because she did not speak the English language.
M1301 CHAWANOCHUBBY, Samuel CHIF#93 p5 |
M1301 CHAWANOCHUBBY, Samuel CHIF#93 p5 |
M1186 CLARK, Mason CHIF#54F |
M 1186 CLARK, Mason CHIF#54R |
There is another document included in the packet of Samuel
CHAWANOCUBBY that is very revealing and again points to the hypocrisy of the
Dawes Commission and the Chickasaw Nation. Despite the attempts to distance the
Chickasaw Nation from the children of Chickasaw men and accept them as citizens
in the nation; some citizens developed personal relationships that allowed them
to testify about those relationships.
One of the prerequisites to prove an individual was entitled to receive
a land allotment or prove their citizenship required the testimony of friends
or relatives. In the case of Samuel CHAWANOCHUBBY and his sister Mason CLARK a “full
blood” recognized Chickasaw citizen provided testimony about their parents
based on her acquaintance and knowledge. Unfortunately the testimony of Mollie
PORTER a Chickasaw Indian, was not enough to have the children of Isom
CHAWANOCHUBBY aka NEWBERRY enrolled as Chickasaw by blood.
M1301 CHAWANOCHUBBY, Samuel CHIF#93 p7 |
M1186 PORTER, Joe (PORTER, Mollie) CHIBB#76 |
Let me point out one more important issue that shouldn’t be
lost on those who don’t think the Chickasaw Freedmen shared the history and
culture of the Chickasaw Indians despite their enslavement. I don’t know if you
can make the intellectual argument that enslaved people were not acculturated
to the culture of their enslaver and be taken seriously?
On the document that was generated by Mason CLARK and the
woman who knew both her parents Mollie PORTER identifies the person that interpreted Mason’s
testimony as Monroe CLARK Mason's son. There is no mistaking freedmen lived
within the culture of the Chickasaw Nation.
M1301 CHAWANOCHUBBY, Samuel CHIF#93 p7 |
Clearly there are some questions about this family and these people that warrant further research:
- Where are the descendants of Samuel CHAWANOCHUBBY today?
- Where are the descendants of Mason CLARK today?
- Where are the descendants of Mollie PORTER the woman who stood up to do the right thing and testify that Mason and Samuel were Chickasaw Indians worthy of citizenship by blood in the nation of their father's birth?
- Would they have the courage to do what their ancestor did?
- Where is the Chickasaw Nation on issues of citizenship like this, will they continue to ignore their true history?
Empower Me to Know My History
I am a descendent of Mollie Porter. I would love to visit with you on what you have learned.
ReplyDeleteI apologize for not seeing this comment sooner.
DeleteGreetings Johna, thanks for reading the story and responding to my call to hear from the descendants of Mollie PORTER. I don't know that I have a lot to offer but I hope you have something that can add to the story of freedmen interacting with "citizens" of the Chickasaw Nation. Clearly there were a lot of blended relationships that don't get much attention. I would hope there are more stories, more artifacts from all sides of the people who inhabited the nation that have gotten lost with the exclusion of the freedmen and their descendants from the nation.
ReplyDeleteYou can email me at: estelusti@aol.com so we can exchange information. I welcome the opportunity to exchange information, ideas and history with all people of the Chickasaw Nation because of our shared history.
Hi I come from both, Clark and Perry lines.. these are my relatives as well. thank you for sharing this information
ReplyDelete