EQUITY CASE 7071
Rebecca SAMUELS
- Chickasaw
Freedman Card #284
- Enrollment
#1155-1159
- Place
of Residence: Purcell, Pickens County; Indian Territory Chickasaw Nation
- Father:
KEMP, Gibson (Deceased)
- Mother:
KEMP, Manda (Deceased)
·
Joe and
Dillard PERRY files BIA Record Group 75, Entry 90C, Folder F-131
M 1186 #284Front Rebecca SAMUELS Chickasaw Freedwoman |
The family of Rebecca SAMUELS is one of those cases where
you have read between the lines and know a little something about the hundreds
of individuals who sought to be transferred from the Chickasaw or Choctaw
Freedman Roll to the Chickasaw or Choctaw by Blood Roll.
The importance of this issue should never be lost on anyone;
these people were descendants of African and African Natives as well as
Chickasaw or Choctaw Indians. They were attempting to exercise their rights to
receive three hundred and twenty acres of land just as the other “mixed”
Chickasaw Indians.
On the rear of Rebecca SAMUELS Chickasaw Freedman Dawes land
allotment card is the name of her parents and the parents of her children and
sister Mollie HOLDER. Rebecca named her father as Gibson KEMP a Chickasaw
Indian who was deceased at the time of the enrolling process. This information
was not taken into account and given value by the Dawes Commission and in most
cases the admission someone’s father was a Chickasaw Indian ended with that
notation on the back of their Dawes card.
Who was Who Among the Southern Indians a Genealogical Notebook 1698-1907 by Don MARTINI p362 |
The information from the index by Don MARTINI indicates there was a Chickasaw Indian with a similar name to the one on the rear of Rebecca SAMUEL'S Dawes Card and as most genealogist know, "spelling doesn't count." Clearly the information provided indicates Gibson/Gipson KEMP was deceased at the time of the land allotment process but because he may more information and/or other descendants who might connect genealogically with the descendants of Rebecca SAMUELS?
M1186 #284 Rear Rebecca SAMUELS Chickasaw Freedwoman |
However there was a subtle clue inserted into the
application packet (M1301) that provided more information about her claim to be
a descendant of a Chickasaw Indian. On page two of her packet she makes a
profound and important statement; “my mother is Amanda, daughter of John
KEMP (see Chickasaw Freedman Card 274.”) In addition it is
important to note that she includes information about her sister Mollie HOLDER
and the fact “we are sisters by the same mother.”
M1301 #284 Rebecca SAMUELS Chickasaw Freedwoman |
If you will recall a previous article about the KEMP clan
there was no mention of Amanda as the daughter of John KEMP, yet there is a
reference in Rebecca’s file that mentions “Chickasaw Freedmen Card 274.)”
This is another file that demonstrates just how important it
is to obtain and research the Joe and Dillard PERRY database. Many of the
individuals that are claimants on Equity Case 7071 only have hints to their
Chickasaw or Choctaw ancestry in their files because the Dawes Commission only
summarized the information provided in oral testimonies. As a researcher it is
necessary to follow the clues given that may provide the necessary information
that will tell the story of the African-Chickasaw and African-Choctaw Indians
who were denied inclusion in the nation of their ancestor’s birth.
I don’t know that it is possible to definitively state that
these people possessed Chickasaw or Choctaw ancestry. Our best sources for
determining if they did have an Indian ancestor will be the information
provided on the Dawes cards and various other sources like the PERRY files and
DNA test that will support the claims of our ancestors.
I mention DNA test because I’m constantly struck by the
reaction from some in the so called Native American community to dismiss these
test. However it was the Dawes Commission, the United States and the Five Slave
Holding Tribes that came up with the concept of “blood rolls,” “blood quantum”
and “degree of Indian blood.” If they have relied on those concepts and now
want to dismiss the science of DNA testing one has to wonder why?
I say this because recently I was unceremoniously “removed” from a Facebook page devoted to the descendants of Thomas LOVE a recognized Chickasaw citizen after posting a “link” to my previous article. It was argued I was angry and hated the tribe for writing about the issues like Equity Case 7071. Subsequently I was challenged about my ancestor’s claim of having Chickasaw ancestry and she began to attempt discounting the claim and the paper trail.
I say this because recently I was unceremoniously “removed” from a Facebook page devoted to the descendants of Thomas LOVE a recognized Chickasaw citizen after posting a “link” to my previous article. It was argued I was angry and hated the tribe for writing about the issues like Equity Case 7071. Subsequently I was challenged about my ancestor’s claim of having Chickasaw ancestry and she began to attempt discounting the claim and the paper trail.
Another member wanted to know if I had a DNA test perform
for which I informed her I had and posted my GEDmatch numbers on the site so
anyone there who claim to be descendant from Thomas LOVE and his Two Wives
could compare their results if they took a test. It was not long that someone
informed me they took the test and when they checked, they did not see a match
to me after putting my name in the database.
I suggest changing the criteria to both the surname LOVE or
Chickasaw and each time she came back with the response that she did not come
up with a match. However EVERY time I put those words in the database I came
back with matches for someone with a LOVE or COLBERT ancestor. Now I am not an
expert on DNA testing but I have to conclude that if I can come up consistently
with a LOVE or COLBERT Native American ancestor and someone else and this
individual didn’t; maybe they don’t have LOVE or Colbert ancestry at the least
and possibly no Chickasaw ancestry to speak of?
I must say, I am getting to point of believing a statement I
read in Dr. Daniel F. LITTLEFIELD Jr.’s book “The Chickasaw Freedmen a People
Without a Country” (and I’m paraphrasing) that there will come a time when it
is shown that many of the people on Equity Case 7071 and their descendants have
more Native American blood than those on the Dawes by blood rolls. Perhaps that
time has come?
Original Brief Equity Case 7071 (Courtesy of Julia POWERS) |
No comments:
Post a Comment